Journal: Biomedicine Hub

Article Title: Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses

doi: 10.1159/000519139

Figure Lengend Snippet: AcrySof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal.

Article Snippet: This experimental study investigates 2 new EDoF IOLs, the Alcon AcrySof IQ Vivity and the Bausch & Lomb LuxSmart Crystal, on the optical bench, using OptiSpheric IOL PRO2 (Trioptics, Germany) in order to assess the optical quality according to ISO 11979 with ISO-2 Cornea.

Techniques:

Journal: Biomedicine Hub

Article Title: Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses

doi: 10.1159/000519139

Figure Lengend Snippet: Data of MTF (50 lp/mm) and Strehl (mean) of the 2 IOLs

Article Snippet: This experimental study investigates 2 new EDoF IOLs, the Alcon AcrySof IQ Vivity and the Bausch & Lomb LuxSmart Crystal, on the optical bench, using OptiSpheric IOL PRO2 (Trioptics, Germany) in order to assess the optical quality according to ISO 11979 with ISO-2 Cornea.

Techniques:

Journal: Biomedicine Hub

Article Title: Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses

doi: 10.1159/000519139

Figure Lengend Snippet: USAF targets: Vivity (above) and LuxSmart (below) with 3.0 mm apertures (centered, decentered, and tilted).

Article Snippet: This experimental study investigates 2 new EDoF IOLs, the Alcon AcrySof IQ Vivity and the Bausch & Lomb LuxSmart Crystal, on the optical bench, using OptiSpheric IOL PRO2 (Trioptics, Germany) in order to assess the optical quality according to ISO 11979 with ISO-2 Cornea.

Techniques:

Journal: Biomedicine Hub

Article Title: Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses

doi: 10.1159/000519139

Figure Lengend Snippet: USAF targets: Vivity (above) and LuxSmart (below) with 4.5 mm apertures (centered, decentered, and tilted).

Article Snippet: This experimental study investigates 2 new EDoF IOLs, the Alcon AcrySof IQ Vivity and the Bausch & Lomb LuxSmart Crystal, on the optical bench, using OptiSpheric IOL PRO2 (Trioptics, Germany) in order to assess the optical quality according to ISO 11979 with ISO-2 Cornea.

Techniques:

Journal: Frontiers in Medicine

Article Title: Visual outcomes with a non-diffractive enhanced depth-of-focus IOL in patients with age-related macular degeneration

doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1505401

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean monocular logMAR visual acuity with best correction for distance based on the vergence chart for AcrySof IQ Vivity) intraocular lens (IOL) at 6 months post-surgery. The error bars show the standard deviation. The right y-axis shows the Snellen visual acuity in feet and the top x-axis is the distance (cm). Depth-of-focus was defined as the range of lens powers that achieved a mean acuity of 20/32 or better (from 0 D of vergence).

Article Snippet: In this sense, Al-Amri et al. ( ) have evaluated the clinical retinal image quality of different IOLs and found that the Vivity IOL showed comparable outcomes to the monofocal AcrySof SA60AT ( P > 0.05).

Techniques: Standard Deviation

Journal: Biomedicine Hub

Article Title: Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics

doi: 10.1159/000529234

Figure Lengend Snippet: Optics and material of the IOLs analyzed

Article Snippet: Tecnis Symfony (diffractive) and the wavefront-shaping Acrysof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal IOLs (22 D each) were assessed by the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 imaging test bench with an ISO-2 cornea and a wavelength of 546 nm.

Techniques: Refractive Index

Journal: Biomedicine Hub

Article Title: Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics

doi: 10.1159/000529234

Figure Lengend Snippet: Acrysof IQ Vivity IOL with X-WAVE ( ™ ) technology to “stretch and shift light without splitting it” (image and text © Alcon, modified).

Article Snippet: Tecnis Symfony (diffractive) and the wavefront-shaping Acrysof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal IOLs (22 D each) were assessed by the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 imaging test bench with an ISO-2 cornea and a wavelength of 546 nm.

Techniques: Modification

Journal: Biomedicine Hub

Article Title: Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics

doi: 10.1159/000529234

Figure Lengend Snippet: Through focus MTF values at primary peak and at secondary peak (at 50 line pairs/mm, equivalent to 15 cycles/degree)

Article Snippet: Tecnis Symfony (diffractive) and the wavefront-shaping Acrysof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal IOLs (22 D each) were assessed by the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 imaging test bench with an ISO-2 cornea and a wavelength of 546 nm.

Techniques:

Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: The Vivity Extended Range of Vision IOL vs the PanOptix Trifocal, ReStor 2.5 Active Focus and ReStor 3.0 Multifocal Lenses: A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Spectacle Independence

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S347382

Figure Lengend Snippet: Demographics

Article Snippet: To date, patient-reported satisfaction beyond glare/halo has not been compared between the AcrySof IQ PanOptix and the AcrySof IQ Vivity IOLs.

Techniques:

Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: The Vivity Extended Range of Vision IOL vs the PanOptix Trifocal, ReStor 2.5 Active Focus and ReStor 3.0 Multifocal Lenses: A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Spectacle Independence

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S347382

Figure Lengend Snippet: Responses to the question, “How much do you notice glare or halos around lights in dim light situation?” suggest that patients implanted with Vivity IOLs were significantly less likely to notice glare and halos more than “just a little” and significantly more likely not to notice these symptoms at all compared to all other IOL cohorts. (p<0.02 vs Panoptix, p<0.03 vs 2.5/3.0 and 2.5 mini-mono, Chi squared test).

Article Snippet: To date, patient-reported satisfaction beyond glare/halo has not been compared between the AcrySof IQ PanOptix and the AcrySof IQ Vivity IOLs.

Techniques:

Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: The Vivity Extended Range of Vision IOL vs the PanOptix Trifocal, ReStor 2.5 Active Focus and ReStor 3.0 Multifocal Lenses: A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Spectacle Independence

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S347382

Figure Lengend Snippet: Patient-Reported Spectacle Dependence (Response to the Question, “Do You Ever Need to Use Spectacles for the Following Activities?”)

Article Snippet: To date, patient-reported satisfaction beyond glare/halo has not been compared between the AcrySof IQ PanOptix and the AcrySof IQ Vivity IOLs.

Techniques:

Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: The Vivity Extended Range of Vision IOL vs the PanOptix Trifocal, ReStor 2.5 Active Focus and ReStor 3.0 Multifocal Lenses: A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Spectacle Independence

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S347382

Figure Lengend Snippet: Satisfaction ratings of the Vivity lens were similar to other lenses among patients responding “very satisfied” or “satisfied”. Significantly more patients responded “very satisfied” to the Panoptix lens compared to all others.

Article Snippet: To date, patient-reported satisfaction beyond glare/halo has not been compared between the AcrySof IQ PanOptix and the AcrySof IQ Vivity IOLs.

Techniques:

Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: The Vivity Extended Range of Vision IOL vs the PanOptix Trifocal, ReStor 2.5 Active Focus and ReStor 3.0 Multifocal Lenses: A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Spectacle Independence

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S347382

Figure Lengend Snippet: All four groups had very good refractive accuracy. Compared to the Vivity, 2.5/3.0, and 2.5 mini-monovision cohorts, the PanOptix cohort had significantly higher refractive accuracy among patients within 0.25 and 0 diopters of emmetropia (P< 0.0001, chi-squared test for both groups).

Article Snippet: To date, patient-reported satisfaction beyond glare/halo has not been compared between the AcrySof IQ PanOptix and the AcrySof IQ Vivity IOLs.

Techniques:

Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: The Refractive Cataract Surgery Survey (RCSS): A Validated Questionnaire for Quick Clinical Use

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S515694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Breakdown of IOLs

Article Snippet: A total of 477 eyes from 240 patients were included, including 234 AcrySof PanOptix, 53 AcrySof IQ Vivity, 88 TECNIS Eyhance, 102 AcrySof Aspheric Monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Techniques:

Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: The Refractive Cataract Surgery Survey (RCSS): A Validated Questionnaire for Quick Clinical Use

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S515694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Combined Refractive Results: The combined refractive results of all IOLs including AcrySof PanOptix, AcrySof IQ Vivity, TECNIS Eyhance, and AcrySof Aspheric Monofocal were analyzed regarding. ( A ) Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity. ( B ) Binocular uncorrected near visual acuity. ( C ) Spherical equivalent refractive accuracy, and ( D ) residual astigmatism.

Article Snippet: A total of 477 eyes from 240 patients were included, including 234 AcrySof PanOptix, 53 AcrySof IQ Vivity, 88 TECNIS Eyhance, 102 AcrySof Aspheric Monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Techniques:

Journal: Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Article Title: The Refractive Cataract Surgery Survey (RCSS): A Validated Questionnaire for Quick Clinical Use

doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S515694

Figure Lengend Snippet: RCSS Survey Results: The individual scores for the AcrySof PanOptix, AcrySof IQ Vivity, TECNIS Eyhance, and AcrySof Aspheric Monofocal IOL for ( A ) Questions 1–7 and ( B ) questions 8–10.

Article Snippet: A total of 477 eyes from 240 patients were included, including 234 AcrySof PanOptix, 53 AcrySof IQ Vivity, 88 TECNIS Eyhance, 102 AcrySof Aspheric Monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Techniques:

Journal: Biomedicine Hub

Article Title: Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics

doi: 10.1159/000529234

Figure Lengend Snippet: Optics and material of the IOLs analyzed

Article Snippet: Tecnis Symfony (diffractive) and the wavefront-shaping Acrysof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal IOLs (22 D each) were assessed by the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 imaging test bench with an ISO-2 cornea and a wavelength of 546 nm.

Techniques: Refractive Index

Journal: Biomedicine Hub

Article Title: Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics

doi: 10.1159/000529234

Figure Lengend Snippet: LuxSmart IOL (image and text © Bausch & Lomb, modified).

Article Snippet: Tecnis Symfony (diffractive) and the wavefront-shaping Acrysof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal IOLs (22 D each) were assessed by the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 imaging test bench with an ISO-2 cornea and a wavelength of 546 nm.

Techniques: Modification

Journal: Biomedicine Hub

Article Title: Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics

doi: 10.1159/000529234

Figure Lengend Snippet: Through focus MTF values at primary peak and at secondary peak (at 50 line pairs/mm, equivalent to 15 cycles/degree)

Article Snippet: Tecnis Symfony (diffractive) and the wavefront-shaping Acrysof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal IOLs (22 D each) were assessed by the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 imaging test bench with an ISO-2 cornea and a wavelength of 546 nm.

Techniques: